Dhamma Principles › The Channa Discourse: Why Greed, Hate and Delusion Are Worth Abandoning
The Channa Discourse: Why Greed, Hate and Delusion Are Worth Abandoning
Core teachings

The Channa Discourse: Why Greed, Hate and Delusion Are Worth Abandoning

Andhakaraṇo acakkhukaraṇo aññāṇakaraṇo

A wanderer from another school asks Ānanda what danger he sees that makes him teach the abandoning of greed, hate and delusion. Ānanda does not answer that the teacher said so; he walks through the damage layer by layer, from thoughts of harming, to deeds, to no longer seeing anyone's welfare as it really is.

7 points

In the Channa Sutta of the Ānanda chapter, Book of Threes, Aṅguttara Nikāya, the wanderer Channa goes to Venerable Ānanda at Jeta's Grove near Sāvatthī. After the usual greetings he asks directly: do you people prescribe the abandoning of greed, of hate, of delusion? When Ānanda says yes, he asks what danger they see in these three that makes them prescribe abandoning them.

Ānanda answers by laying out the damage in stages. One who is overcome by greed, with the mind obsessed by it, thinks of harming himself, thinks of harming others, thinks of harming both, and experiences suffering and grief in the mind. He behaves badly by body, speech and mind. He does not understand his own welfare as it really is, nor the welfare of others, nor the welfare of both. When it is abandoned, none of this happens. He concludes each section the same way: greed, hate and delusion make one blind, make one sightless, make one unknowing, extinguish wisdom, side with vexation, and do not lead to nibbāna.

Channa then asks whether there is a path and a practice for abandoning them. Ānanda says there is: the noble eightfold path. Hearing this, Channa says the path and the practice are good, and enough to make one diligent. The discourse ends there, with no criticism anywhere of the school he belongs to.

  1. 1

    Seeing the danger comes first Rāge ādīnavaṃ disvā

    Ānanda sums up his answer: seeing this danger in greed, we prescribe abandoning greed; seeing this danger in hate, abandoning hate; seeing this danger in delusion, abandoning delusion. The abandoning rests on seeing the danger, not on an instruction.

    Applying it in daily life

    Before giving something up, spend ten minutes writing down what it actually does to you, and keep it to reread on the days your resolve weakens.

  2. 2

    First layer: thoughts of harming Attabyābādhāyapi ceteti

    One overcome and obsessed by greed, hate or delusion thinks of harming himself, of harming others, of harming both, and experiences suffering and grief in the mind. When these are abandoned, those thoughts and that mental pain no longer arise.

    Applying it in daily life

    Next time you are really angry, notice how fast thoughts of hurting yourself or someone else appear. That is the first danger the discourse names, and a signal to stop before acting.

  3. 3

    Second layer: it comes out as behaviour Kāyena duccaritaṃ carati

    Once the mind is overcome, it does not stay in the mind. It becomes misconduct by body, by speech and by mind. When greed, hate and delusion are abandoned, there is no misconduct in any of the three.

    Applying it in daily life

    When emotions run high, set a rule in advance: no typing, no calling, no big decisions until you have slept on it.

  4. 4

    Third layer: not seeing anyone's welfare as it is Attatthaṃpi yathābhūtaṃ nappajānāti

    The deepest damage in Ānanda's answer is that one overcome does not understand his own welfare as it really is, nor the welfare of others, nor the welfare of both. When it is abandoned, he understands all three as they really are.

    Applying it in daily life

    When you notice you are craving hard or very angry, postpone decisions that affect other people. At that moment you genuinely cannot see the long-term picture.

  5. 5

    Making one blind and extinguishing wisdom Andhakaraṇo acakkhukaraṇo aññāṇakaraṇo

    Each section closes with the same phrases: it makes one blind, makes one sightless, makes one unknowing, extinguishes wisdom, sides with vexation, and does not lead to nibbāna. The discourse speaks about the effect on seeing clearly, not about punishment.

    Applying it in daily life

    If you have been misjudging people or misreading situations lately, look back and ask what craving, anger or confusion has been sitting in the mind.

  6. 6

    There is a way out, and it can be walked Ayameva ariyo aṭṭhaṅgiko maggo

    Asked whether there is a path and practice for abandoning greed, hate and delusion, Ānanda says there is: the noble eightfold path — right view, right intention, right speech, right action, right livelihood, right effort, right mindfulness, right concentration. The answer does not stop at naming the problem.

    Applying it in daily life

    When you point out a problem, at home or at work, always attach a proposal for what to do next. Naming the problem alone usually just creates tension.

  7. 7

    Begins in doubt, ends in respect Alañca panāvuso ānanda appamādāya

    Channa does not announce a conversion. He simply says the path and the practice are good and enough to make one diligent, and the discourse ends there. Throughout the conversation there is not a single word criticising his own school.

    Applying it in daily life

    A conversation about belief with someone who disagrees does not have to end with one side giving in. If both sides understand each other's reasons, it has succeeded.

Try it in daily life

What is usable straight away here is not a list of terms but a way of answering the question "why abandon it?" Ānanda does not appeal to his teacher's authority and does not say it is sinful. He points to something the questioner can check in his own life.

Try it on a habit you actually want to drop. Instead of repeating that it is bad, write out the specific damage you can see for yourself: what it makes you think, what it makes you do, and what it stops you from seeing. Resolve that grows out of seeing the damage tends to last longer than resolve built on fear or shame.

The tone of the conversation is also worth noticing. The questioner is an outsider asking in good faith, and he gets an answer made purely of reasons. You can talk about belief with people who disagree in exactly this way: describe what you see, rather than telling them they are wrong.

Sign in to keep track of what you have read

Sources in the Tipiṭaka

Tap to read the actual passage on the page cited.

Other principles worth reading

Log in to earn 40 merit points for reading this page