Sixteen Qualities That Make One Hard to Admonish
Soḷasa dovacassakaraṇā dhammāSixteen mirrors for the mind from the Anumāna Sutta — habits that make people stop correcting us, and how to c…
Going deeper
Vacībheda and Dukkhāhāra Kathā: Speaking While Absorbed, and Saying the Word Suffering
Vacībhedakathā
Two debates on the relation between speech and the state of the mind. The first asks whether someone in an attainment can utter speech; the second asks whether uttering the word suffering is a factor of the path.
7 points
In the Vacībheda Kathā and Dukkhāhāra Kathā of the Kathāvatthu, volume 37 of the Tipiṭaka, chapter two, the opponent holds that one who has entered an attainment can still utter speech, believing that one penetrating the noble truths exclaims the word suffering. The Theravādin asks whether speech is then uttered in every attainment, in every realm and at all times, which the opponent cannot accept.
The most direct question concerns body and speech. If one in an attainment has a body but the body does not move, why should having speech mean that speech breaks forth? And when asked what knowledge takes as its range, the opponent answers the truths; asked what ear-consciousness takes as its range, he answers sound. The Theravādin points out that two minds with different objects do not coincide in one moment.
The opponent appeals to the teaching that applied and sustained thought are verbal formations, and that one in the first jhāna still has them. The Theravādin replies that then one in the first jhāna with the earth kasiṇa as object must also utter speech, which the opponent denies; and he quotes the Buddha's words that sound is a thorn to the first jhāna, and the passage that the speech of one in the first jhāna has ceased.
The next debate, the Dukkhāhāra Kathā, is very short. The opponent holds that uttering the word suffering is a factor of the path and included in the path. The Theravādin asks whether everyone who utters the word suffering therefore develops the path: does a foolish ordinary person, or even one who has committed a deed of immediate result? The commentary (aṭṭhakathā) attributes the view in the Vacībheda Kathā to the Pubbaseliyas. The school name comes from the commentary, not from the text itself.
-
1
Can one in an attainment utter speech? Samāpannassa atthi vacībhedo
The opponent says yes. The Theravādin asks whether speech is then uttered in every realm, at all times, by everyone and in all attainments. The opponent denies each, which means the statement he accepted carries conditions he has not stated. This point is for overall understanding.
Applying it in daily lifeWhen you accept a broad principle, state its limits as well, or a single counter-example will overturn it.
-
2
A body that does not move, but speech that does? Samāpannassa atthi kāyo natthi kāyabhedo
The Theravādin points out the inconsistency: the opponent accepts that one in an attainment has a body without bodily movement, so why say he has speech and also utterance? By the same rule, speech should be present without breaking forth.
Applying it in daily lifeCheck whether you are applying the same standard to every case. Views that use a double standard are weak exactly there.
-
3
Knowledge ranges over truths, hearing ranges over sound Ñāṇaṃ saccagocaraṃ sotaṃ saddagocaraṃ
The Theravādin asks what knowledge takes as its range; the opponent answers the truths. Asked what ear-consciousness takes as its range, he answers sound. The Theravādin concludes that since the objects differ, it cannot be said that one in an attainment utters speech.
Applying it in daily lifeIf you are listening to someone, really listen; do not compose your reply at the same time. The mind does two things at once far worse than we think.
-
4
Two contacts and two minds do not coincide Dvinnaṃ vedanānaṃ dvinnaṃ saññānaṃ
The Theravādin asks whether there can be a coincidence of two contacts, two feelings, two perceptions, two intentions and two minds. The opponent says that cannot be said. Both sides share the principle that in one moment there is one mind.
Applying it in daily lifeWhat we call multitasking is really rapid switching, and it makes both tasks worse.
-
5
Sound is a thorn to the first jhāna Paṭhamassa jhānassa saddo kaṇṭako
The opponent quotes this saying to show that sound is still involved in the first jhāna. The Theravādin answers with the whole list: applied and sustained thought are a thorn to the second jhāna, rapture to the third, in-and-out breathing to the fourth, and so on up to perception and feeling being a thorn to the cessation of perception and feeling. If being a thorn meant still being present, one in that cessation would still have perception and feeling, which is unacceptable.
Applying it in daily lifeWhat disturbs concentration is not part of concentration. Knowing what the disturbance is helps you arrange your surroundings properly.
-
6
The appeal to a voice heard across the world system Sahassīlokadhātuṃ sarena viññāpesi
The opponent quotes the passage in which Abhibhū, a disciple of the Buddha Sikhī, standing in the brahmā world, made a thousandfold world system hear his voice: begin, strive, apply yourselves to the Buddha's teaching, shake off the army of death as an elephant demolishes a reed hut. The passage is genuine, but it does not say he was in an attainment while speaking.
Applying it in daily lifeWhen citing evidence, check whether it actually answers the question being asked.
-
7
Saying the word suffering is not a path factor Dukkhāhāro maggaṅgaṃ
In the Dukkhāhāra Kathā the opponent holds that uttering the word suffering is a factor of the path and included in the path. The Theravādin asks briefly: does everyone who utters that word develop the path? Does a foolish ordinary person? Does one who has killed his mother or father, killed an arahant, shed a Buddha's blood or caused a schism in the Saṅgha? The opponent denies it, and the debate ends there.
Applying it in daily lifeFluency with Dhamma terms is no measure of understanding. Measure by how your mind actually changes when something hits you.
Try it in daily life
The setting is meditative attainment, but the principle is for everyone: the moment in which the mind is truly absorbed in something and the moment in which it is narrating that thing in words are not the same moment. Often what we take for concentration is really commentary on our own experience.
When watching the breath or an emotion, naming it — this is anger, this is boredom — helps at first. But if you stay at the naming, the mind lives with the label rather than with what is happening. Try letting the words drop and see what remains.
The Dukkhāhāra Kathā makes an even plainer point. Saying that life is suffering, posting Dhamma quotes or reciting terms fluently does not mean understanding. Words are only words. What changes the mind is seeing for yourself, again and again, until the mind agrees.
Sources in the Tipiṭaka
Tap to read the actual passage on the page cited.
- Vacībheda Kathā and Dukkhāhāra Kathā Thai Royal Edition · Volume 37 · page 263 Speech by one in an attainment, and uttering the word suffering as a factor of the path
Other principles worth reading
The Inquirer: Examining Even the Teacher
VīmaṃsakasuttaṃThe Buddha tells monks to examine him to see whether he is truly enlightened: by observing what can be seen an…
Eleven Benefits of Loving-Kindness
Mettāya ekādasānisaṃsāEleven benefits of regularly developing loving-kindness — sleeping well, waking well, no bad dreams, being dea…
Bhikkhunī Vibhaṅga: Don't Stand Between Giver and Receiver
Ubhayenamha paribāhirā bhogehi ca puññena caA family intends to give robe-cloth to the Saṅgha of nuns, but Thullanandā tells them they are too busy; later…