Dhamma Principles › Paṭṭhāna: The Negative Method, and Why the Book Repeats So Much
Paṭṭhāna: The Negative Method, and Why the Book Repeats So Much
Going deeper

Paṭṭhāna: The Negative Method, and Why the Book Repeats So Much

Paccanīyaṃ

The Paṭṭhāna does not only ask what is a condition for what. It also asks the negative question — what arises when this is not the condition — then combines affirmative and negative into four methods. The vast length of the book comes from this way of counting, not from new content.

7 points

In the Paṭṭhāna of the Abhidhamma Piṭaka, what makes the book run to six volumes is not the number of teachings but the way it asks. Having asked which state arises dependent on which state through which condition, the text asks the same question again in the negative — for example, "an unwholesome state arises dependent on an unwholesome state, not because of root condition" — and answers that this is delusion accompanied by doubt and by restlessness.

In every chapter the text counts the instances in all four methods: affirmative (anuloma), negative (paccanīya), affirmative-negative (anuloma-paccanīya), which starts from an affirmed condition and combines it with negated ones, and negative-affirmative (paccanīyānuloma), which reverses the order. In the Wholesome triplet the affirmative-negative method alone takes about two hundred pages.

The whole procedure is then repeated three more times at the largest scale. Volume forty-five opens with the Negative Paṭṭhāna, which takes all the triplets and pairs and puts them in the negative — "the not-wholesome triplet", for instance — followed by the Affirmative-Negative Paṭṭhāna and closing with the Negative-Affirmative Paṭṭhāna.

This page is for overall understanding. It does not go into the numbers or the counting, but explains what the method is for.

  1. 1

    What a negative question is Nahetupaccayā

    In the Dependent Chapter of the Wholesome triplet, once the affirmative side is finished, the text begins the negative exposition with the sentence "an unwholesome state arises dependent on an unwholesome state, not because of root condition", and answers that this is delusion accompanied by doubt and by restlessness, arising dependent on the aggregates accompanied by doubt and by restlessness.

    Applying it in daily life

    To understand something, also ask what it can arise without. The answer often reveals the core faster than a direct explanation.

  2. 2

    The negative method draws boundaries Paccanīyaṃ

    The negative answers are not empty; they name the actual cases that remain. Asked what arises not because of object condition, the answer is that mind-produced materiality arises dependent on wholesome aggregates — because materiality has no object. This shows the student what each condition can and cannot apply to.

    Applying it in daily life

    At work, writing down what is out of scope prevents more misunderstanding than writing only what is in scope.

  3. 3

    A prose summary before the counting begins Pañhāvāro

    In the Investigation Chapter of the Wholesome triplet, before the negative counting begins, the text inserts a short prose summary stating which pairs of states can be conditions for each other and by which conditions — for instance, a wholesome state is a condition for an indeterminate state by way of object, conascence, decisive support, postnascence and kamma. That summary underlies all the numbers that follow.

    Applying it in daily life

    Before going into a long set of details, write a short summary first. It keeps both writer and reader from getting lost.

  4. 4

    The four methods of counting Anulomapaccanīyaṃ

    Every chapter in the Paṭṭhāna counts instances in all four methods: affirmative, negative, affirmative-negative and negative-affirmative. The last two are combinations: one condition is taken as the root and combined with the others in their opposite form. The counting therefore expands into large tables of numbers with no new descriptive content.

    Applying it in daily life

    When deciding something, run through four similar angles: what you gain by doing it, gain by not doing it, lose by doing it, lose by not doing it.

  5. 5

    Negative-affirmative: negate first, then affirm Paccanīyānulomaṃ

    The last method reverses the third: it starts from a condition in negative form as the root and combines it with affirmed conditions. In volume forty-five this is raised into a whole method of its own, the Negative-Affirmative Paṭṭhāna, which sets out sentences such as "an unwholesome state arises dependent on a state that is not wholesome, because of root condition".

    Applying it in daily life

    Try describing yourself by what is not the case, for instance "this is not yet the moment to decide". That kind of phrasing genuinely lowers the pressure.

  6. 6

    The four great methods of the whole book Paccanīyapaṭṭhānaṃ

    Seen at the level of the whole work, the Paṭṭhāna has four great methods. The Affirmative Paṭṭhāna fills volumes forty to forty-four; volume forty-five then gathers the other three together — the Negative Paṭṭhāna, the Affirmative-Negative Paṭṭhāna and the Negative-Affirmative Paṭṭhāna. These three are far more abbreviated, since they mostly refer back to the first.

    Applying it in daily life

    When reading a thick treatise, look at the structure first — how many times it repeats and how each round differs. You will read faster without reading every line.

  7. 7

    States that are not wholesome Nakusalattikaṃ

    Volume forty-five opens with the Negative Triplet Paṭṭhāna, whose first section is the not-wholesome triplet, setting out "a state that is not wholesome arises dependent on a state that is not wholesome, because of root condition", and explaining that states which are not wholesome comprise unwholesome states and indeterminate states. Adding "not" does not empty the category; it widens it and makes the categories overlap.

    Applying it in daily life

    Saying "not that" usually covers several things at once. When communicating, say what you do mean rather than only what you do not.

Try it in daily life

The negative method is more useful than it looks, because a negative question forces the boundary of what you are talking about into view. Asking what can arise without a root immediately narrows and sharpens what remains.

It can be applied directly to oneself. When you conclude that you are always a certain way, ask back: when am I not? The exceptions you find usually reveal the real conditions better than the broad conclusion did.

The repetitiveness has a lesson of its own. Going through every case without skipping guards against guessing. If you do work where mistakes are costly, a checklist that runs through every item is tedious but safer than relying on memory.

Sign in to keep track of what you have read

Sources in the Tipiṭaka

Tap to read the actual passage on the page cited.

Other principles worth reading

Log in to earn 40 merit points for reading this page