Dhamma Principles › The Aggregates Pairs, Wheel Sections: A Part and the Whole
The Aggregates Pairs, Wheel Sections: A Part and the Whole
Going deeper

The Aggregates Pairs, Wheel Sections: A Part and the Whole

Rūpaṃ khandhoti

After checking terms one by one, the Aggregates Pairs turn their questions like a wheel. Is form an aggregate? Yes. Is an aggregate the form aggregate? Not all of it, since the remaining aggregates are aggregates but not the form aggregate. The section trains us to tell a part from the whole, and shows that some things are not aggregates at all.

7 points

In the Khandha-yamaka (Pairs on the Aggregates) of the Yamaka, Abhidhamma Piṭaka volume 38, the terminology section (paṇṇattivāra) has four sets of questions. The first, the word-clarifying section (padasodhanavāra), checks each term: is form the form aggregate, is feeling the feeling aggregate? The second, the wheel of clarified words (padasodhanamūlacakkavāra), pairs each checked term with the other aggregates in a full circle. The third, the pure-aggregate section (suddhakhandhavāra), asks simply whether form is an aggregate. The fourth (suddhakhandhamūlacakkavāra) turns that third set round the full circle again.

Cakka means wheel, and the method works like turning one. One aggregate is fixed as the hub, and each of the others is asked about in turn: fixing form, it asks whether an aggregate is the feeling aggregate, the perception aggregate, and so on to the consciousness aggregate; then feeling becomes the hub, until all five have had their turn. Every set has an affirmative (anuloma) and a negative (paccanīka) side.

The point that the word "form" is wider than "form aggregate" is covered elsewhere on this site. This page looks at a different angle: the relation between a part and the whole, which the answers in the wheel show again and again, systematically.

This point is for overall understanding. Only a few pairs are given as examples; the rest follow the same pattern.

  1. 1

    Is it an aggregate? Yes Vedanā khandhoti

    In the pure-aggregate section the first question is: is form an aggregate? The text answers yes. Feeling, perception, formations and consciousness are answered yes too: every aggregate is an aggregate. It looks obvious, but it is the ground for the reverse question that follows.

    Applying it in daily life

    Whenever you sort things into categories, first ask whether this item really belongs in this category, before asking anything more complex.

  2. 2

    Asked in reverse, the answer is partial Avasesā khandhā khandhā na vedanākkhandho

    Asked in reverse — is an aggregate the form aggregate? — the text answers neither yes nor no. It says the form aggregate is both an aggregate and the form aggregate; the remaining aggregates are aggregates but not the form aggregate. "Aggregate" covers all five; the form aggregate is only one of the five.

    Applying it in daily life

    When you hear a sentence like "work is all about money", ask in reverse: is money a part of work, or the whole of it?

  3. 3

    Turning full circle through every pair Khandhā vedanākkhandhoti

    In the wheel of clarified words, the text asks whether form is the form aggregate, then whether an aggregate is the feeling aggregate, the perception aggregate and so on to the end; then feeling, perception, formations and consciousness each become the starting point in turn. The second half of the answer is the same each round: that aggregate is both an aggregate and the aggregate of that name; the remaining ones are aggregates but not the aggregate of that name.

    Applying it in daily life

    When checking a system or a document, go through every pair systematically instead of spot-checking only the pairs that come to mind.

  4. 4

    Precision of terms is kept in every round Saṅkhārakkhandhaṃ ṭhapetvā avasesā saṅkhārā

    In the wheel, the first half of each question still uses the answers from the word check. Asked whether formations are the formations aggregate, the text answers that, apart from the formations aggregate, the remaining formations are formations but not the formations aggregate; for feeling and consciousness it answers yes at once. The wheel does not drop the precision of terms when the pairing changes.

    Applying it in daily life

    Once you have agreed on the meaning of a word, keep that meaning for the whole conversation rather than shifting it halfway.

  5. 5

    Not form, yet still an aggregate Na rūpaṃ na khandhoti

    On the negative side the text asks: is what is not form not an aggregate? It answers that, apart from form, the remaining aggregates are not form but are aggregates. Feeling, perception, formations and consciousness are not form, yet they are still aggregates. Falling outside a sub-category does not mean falling outside the larger one.

    Applying it in daily life

    When a problem turns out not to be a technical one, don't conclude it isn't the team's concern. It may be a different kind of problem that is still your responsibility.

  6. 6

    Some things are neither form nor aggregate Na ceva rūpaṃ na ca khandhā

    The same answer goes on: apart from form and the aggregates, the remaining phenomena are neither form nor aggregates. The five aggregates do not cover everything. In Abhidhamma terms, Nibbāna is a phenomenon not counted among the five aggregates. This point is for overall understanding.

    Applying it in daily life

    When you draw up categories, leave room for things that fit none of them rather than forcing everything into the ones you have.

  7. 7

    Why ask in both directions Khandhayamakaṃ

    If you ask only one way — is form an aggregate? — and get yes, you might go on to assume that an aggregate is form. Asking in reverse every time closes the gap for over-generalising: seeing that A is B and taking it that B is A. This point is for overall understanding.

    Applying it in daily life

    When you reach a conclusion like "successful people get up early", ask in reverse: "does everyone who gets up early succeed?" The answers usually differ.

Try it in daily life

A common error in thinking is to see that A is part of B and then to take B to be A — for example, seeing that money is part of happiness and concluding that happiness is money. The wheel of questions trains you to ask the reverse every time, which catches this error.

Another lesson is that something outside a sub-category may still belong to the larger category, and some things belong to none of our categories. Knowing the limits of our categories keeps us from forcing everything into the boxes we already have.

Working through every pair also helps with ordinary work, such as checking documents, testing a system or planning. Mistakes tend to hide in the pairs we never asked about.

Sign in to keep track of what you have read

Sources in the Tipiṭaka

Tap to read the actual passage on the page cited.

Other principles worth reading

Log in to earn 40 merit points for reading this page