The Four Right Efforts
Cattāro sammappadhānāEffort in four directions — prevent, abandon, develop and maintain. It covers both guarding what you have and …
Atītārammaṇattikaṃ
The past-object triplet sorts states by the time of the object the mind takes: past, future or present. The text's examples show that one and the same past can be the object of seeing impermanence, or the object of delight and grief; and seeing impermanence in one time frame supports seeing it in the others.
In the Paṭṭhāna of the Abhidhamma Piṭaka, volume 41, there is a triplet called the past-object triplet (atītārammaṇa-tika). It sorts states by their object: states with a past object, states with a future object, and states with a present object. It does not ask when the mind itself arises, since every mind arises in the present; it asks which time the mind at that moment is dealing with.
In the Investigation Chapter, under the object and predominance conditions, the text repeats a set of examples: a person contemplates past aggregates as impermanent, suffering and not-self, or delights in and relishes them until lust, view, doubt, restlessness and grief arise; the noble ones review defilements they have abandoned; and a person knows another's mind by the knowledge of others' minds. Under the decisive-support condition the text gives contemplation of impermanence, of suffering and of not-self as supports that cross all three times.
Many examples in this triplet concern higher knowledges and attainments, such as recollection of past lives, knowledge of the future and the base of infinite consciousness. This page picks only what is close to daily life. The modern examples are illustrations only; they are not from the text.
This triplet applies to states that have an object, that is, mind and mental factors. A state that takes what has passed is called past-object; one that takes what has not yet come is future-object; one that takes what is present is present-object. The text runs these three groups through the conditions one by one. This point is for overall understanding.
Pause three times a day and notice whether your mind is on yesterday, tomorrow or what is in front of you. Just label it silently, without trying to fix anything.
Under the object condition the text sets two paths side by side: a person contemplates past aggregates as impermanent, suffering and not-self; or delights in and relishes them, and with those aggregates as object, lust, view, doubt, restlessness and grief arise. The same memory can be an object for wisdom or for defilement.
When you recall good times in the past, notice whether your mind feels lighter afterwards or starts to long for them. If longing begins, remember that that period has passed like every other.
Under predominance by way of object, the text says a person makes past aggregates a weighty object, delights in and relishes them, and because of making them weighty, lust and view arise. A past event the mind gives great weight to also pulls defilement along with more force.
If one old matter keeps coming back until it becomes the centre of your day, write it all down once on paper and set it aside, instead of going over it again and again in your head.
The text uses wording parallel to the past side: a person contemplates future aggregates as impermanent, suffering and not-self, or delights in and relishes them until lust or grief arises. The mind that thinks ahead can go two ways, just like the mind that looks back.
When you worry about tomorrow, separate the part that is planning you can act on from the part that is just circling. Do the first part, and remember that what has not yet come is impermanent too.
Looking back is not only regret or relish. The text says the noble ones review defilements they have abandoned, review defilements they have suppressed, and know defilements that arose before. This kind of review looks at the past to see what has changed, not to sink into it.
At the end of each month, review which habits used to arise often and have now lessened. Note them briefly, without blaming yourself for what still remains.
Under natural decisive support, the text says that contemplation of impermanence, of suffering and of not-self with a past object is a condition for the same contemplation with a past, future or present object, and so in every direction. Seeing trained in one time frame is not wasted; it passes strength to the others.
If you cannot yet catch impermanence in the present, start with something already past where it is clearer, such as yesterday's anger that faded on its own, then bring that view to what is happening now.
Most people spend more time in their heads with what has passed and what has not yet come than they realise. This triplet does not say that thinking of the past or future is wrong. The text's examples show that the same object can go two ways: towards seeing impermanence, or towards relish, longing and grief.
What you can use at once is to notice which time your mind is in right now, then ask whether you are contemplating or relishing. That one question is often enough to see where a thought about the past is taking you.
Another useful point: seeing impermanence in things already gone is usually easier than seeing it in what is happening now. The text says such seeing supports seeing across time, so you can start practising with old events.
Tap to read the actual passage on the page cited.
Effort in four directions — prevent, abandon, develop and maintain. It covers both guarding what you have and …
When one does not know and see as it really is, one should seek a teacher, and then practise training, exertio…
The Paṭisambhidāmagga explains in detail that as you know the long and short breath, desire and gladness make …
As a Bodhisatta, the Buddha divided his thoughts into two classes — sensual desire, ill will and cruelty on on…