“It may be, monks, that a monk is quarrelsome and argumentative, one who creates legal issues in the Sangha. The monks consider, ‘This monk is quarrelsome and argumentative, one who creates legal issues in the Sangha. Well then, let’s do a legal procedure of censure against him.’ They do the procedure against him—illegitimately and with an incomplete assembly. He then goes to another monastery. There too the monks consider, ‘The Sangha did a legal procedure of censure against this monk—illegitimately and with an incomplete assembly. Well then, let’s do a procedure of censure against him.’ They do the procedure against him—illegitimately but with a unanimous assembly. He then goes to yet another monastery. There too the monks consider, ‘The Sangha did a legal procedure of censure against this monk—illegitimately but with a unanimous assembly. Well then, let’s do a procedure of censure against him.’ They do the procedure against him—legitimately but with an incomplete assembly. He then goes to yet another monastery. There too the monks consider, ‘The Sangha did a legal procedure of censure against this monk—legitimately but with an incomplete assembly. Well then, let’s do a procedure of censure against him.’ They do the procedure against him—in a legitimate-like way and with an incomplete assembly. He then goes to yet another monastery. There too the monks consider, ‘The Sangha did a legal procedure of censure against this monk—in a legitimate-like way and with an incomplete assembly. Well then, let’s do a procedure of censure against him.’ They do the procedure against him—in a legitimate-like way but with a unanimous assembly.